Where am I?

HOME
  • COMMENT Blogs
Charles Bremner - Paris blog

Charles Bremner - Times Online - WBLG

« Sarkozy revises the last war | All Posts | Chatting up the revolution, French style »

May 12, 2008

France enjoys the lazy, hazy days of May.

Holiday

It feels like an August weekend in Paris today. The sun is blazing, as it has for the past week. The streets are largely empty except for tourists. Much of France is enjoying a fifth successive day off work.

President Sarkozy may preach the doctrine of "working more to earn more", but his country has seized the chance to enjoy what the headline in le Parisien newspaper called "Five days of happiness".  The long spring break has been made possible by the lucky timing of two public holidays for the nation that already enjoys more vacation days than any other. Last Thursday, May 8, was the holiday marking victory in World War Two and today is Pentecost (Whitsun in Britain). Friday was supposed to be a working day but schools in the Paris area and many other regions stayed shut  -- so people took the day off, enjoying what is known as le pont, or bridge.

Many even managed nearly 10 days because there was another unofficial pont on Friday May 2, after the May Day holiday fell on a Thursday. Half of France either took that Friday or last Friday or both, according to a poll.

Each unofficial day off costs the economy about 1.8 billion euros, according to the experts. If France worked as much as the British, they would add about one percent to gross domestic product, they say. Such figures produce a shrug. Who would want to live like the British? Why not enjoy life and take off for the countryside or the coast, especially when the weather is as glorious as it has been in northern France for the past week?

Today is an odd case because the Pentecost holiday was officially cancelled for three years and then re-instated last month by Sarkozy. After thousands of elderly people died in a summer heat wave in 2003, President Chirac's government proclaimed Whitsun Monday a working day in the name of "national solidarity". France were supposed to toil without additional pay and the tax levied would go to financing care for the elderly. The idea did not work. People took the day off anyway. Bull-fighting fans said the whole thing was a plot against the Feria at Nîmes, the traditional corrida weekend in the southern city. Under a new scheme, people are expected to donate an extra seven hours work per year to the cause of the elderly. The SNCF railways solved this by adding two minutes 40 seconds to its staff's working day.

A small minority of employees are at work today because their employers have not yet settled on a way of oganising the extra seven hours. The trade unions are protesting in their name. One union, the CFTC, called today on Whitsun workers to strike against their unfair lot. As I woke (to go to work) the CFTC spokesman was explaining the logic on the radio. "France has the most productive workers in the world. To stay like that, they need to disconnect from the working environment from time to time," he said.

French workers need to produce more per hour to compete because, what with holidays and the 35-hour working week, the country labours less than any other. French employees enjoy 37 days annual leave on top of public holidays, according to a survey last month by Harris Interactive. The Italians are next, with 33. The Germans have 27 and the British 26. The poor Americans report an average of 14 vacation days a year.

I don't want to jump to obvious "Anglo-Saxon" conclusions about France and the impact of working less. But I'd point out that the same Parisien that was thrilled by five days off has today devoted its front page to the shock news that thousands of "new poor" French have been reduced to foraging in supermarket rubbish containers for their daily meals. People across Europe have been hit lately by the sharp rise in the cost of living but I get the feeling that France is hurting a little more than most places.   

And I almost forgot. Thousands of people will not be working on Thursday either. Teachers and civil service unions have called a one-day stoppage to protest against Sarko's cuts to teaching staff and ministry personnel.   

Posted by Charles Bremner on May 12, 2008 at 12:08 PM in Europe, France, Life-style, Media, Paris, the economy | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/495259/28995224

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference France enjoys the lazy, hazy days of May. :

Comments

"France get back to work" "The British and the Americans work harder and get less holiday and days off than the French..." I seem to have heard these words before. The Sorbonne students used a little cafe on the Bou Mich called le Source and, resisting wine, I ordered Frankfurters, pommes frites and a glass of milk. "Un pair et un Mendes-France" the waiter yelled. It was 1954.
M-F had told the French to get to bed at night, get up early and work to earn refrigerators etc. like the Americans.
In the army on Fontainebleau a cafe proprietor would be asleep at the bar, wakened occasionally (by me, at 2 a.m.) to order another drink. Suddenly, he was allowed to close at midnight, thanks to M-F.
The question is: Will M. Sarkozy bring in Prohibition?

Posted by: peter kinsley www.peterkinsley.com | 12 May 2008 12:27:51

For the 1st May, the school I work in had "un pont" for the Friday giving a long weekend of 4 days. However, the teaching hours that I would have had on that Friday were taught on the Wednesday afternoon, so in fact the time was just shifted from one half-day to another. This last week, 8th May was a "jour férié", no "pont" followed, Friday was a usual school day, today of course is le lundi de Pentecôte and férié, so 3 days.

PS to the above, dans le privé, me dit-on, on ne fait jamais grêve.

Of course the idea of working le lundi de Pentecôte was what seemed a very strange solution to stop old people from dying in heatwaves which might ot might not occur, and was, at the time the measure was taken, just a usual (if unexpected) government knee-jerk reaction to show they were on the case.

Preventing old people from dying is a laudable goal, can't do anything but declare myself all in favour of it!! : )

Posted by: dot king | 12 May 2008 13:14:22

I'm in Paris too at the moment and thanks to the wonderful weather and many shops, bars and restaurants being open it is very pleasant. However I don't share the enthusiasm that many, French and British alike have for "bank holidays"/ "jours feries".All too often they've got that dreaded Sunday feel to them with everything being closed. Personally I much prefer to have a holiday when it suits me/ my employer and which also allows me to get things done which I don't have time to do when I'm working.

Posted by: isobel | 12 May 2008 13:15:36

People who didn't work this friday, or the other one took this day out from their rtt, if they have them, or out of their holiday time, or, like schools, had one day less break, in the Toussaint holidays as far as I am concerned. And we didn't have any choice on the matter, either. And lots of people have annualised worktime anyway.
As for strike, you can't blame them for not wanting to work more for less money, their working hours have been the same for 60 years, and they haven't had a real raise for 20.And the extra hours are paid about half the regular ones.

Posted by: Pats | 12 May 2008 14:08:15

"Teachers and civil service unions have called a one-day stoppage " - Well, it was just about the only day left to have a strike!
I read the "Parisien" article & here is the link to the video http://videos.leparisien.fr/video/iLyROoafYzau.html - indeed, this situation is very sad but it is all about inflation (pouvoir d'achat)i.e. Sarko's reform which we have been awaiting patiently. My knowledge of economy in general is very limited but I don't really see what this has to do with the few extra days holiday taken by the French! Charles says in a (rather) pompous way "As I woke (to go to work)" - maybe, but I don't think it would have been a real catastophe if he'd have stayed at home - we could have waited until tomorrow to read our Posts!

Posted by: Ros | 12 May 2008 14:52:36

does anyone in france know what Pentecost is?

what ever happened to laicite?

apparently when it contributes to "un pont,' we won't be too rigid in our interpretation of the concept.

could we offer you the Fourth of July? you might be able to put together a 10 day 'pont.' not too shabby.

so here we have another great french contribution to western culture: holiday 'creep.'

actually, i'm jealous. any country that can contrive to put together a forty day vacation for its citizens can't be all bad, even if it is doomed.

Posted by: azloon | 12 May 2008 16:22:48

"My knowledge of economy in general is very limited but I don't really see what this has to do with the few extra days holiday taken by the French! Charles says in a (rather) pompous way "As I woke (to go to work)" (Ros)

Ros, I agree with all you say - me too - limited knowledge of the economy, but when there are people in a country like France who need to scavenge around poubelles to find food, then however the economy works on a large scale seems a universe away and somewhat amorphous.

This country has a shrinking work market*, high business taxes and employment costs, high if (we're told) stable unemployment, and the people at the wrong end of the food chain are expected to foot the bill - or at least get the government out of the hole it's in.
*Apart from restaurants, hôtels and building sites, and seasonal agricultural work, fruit-picking etc, the jobs the French, again, we're told, don't want; often staffed by immigrant workers - you know, the ones they're expelling . . .
Transparently blaming the victim. (One of Mrs Thatcher's most virulent ministers wrote a book with that title "Blaming the victim"; displayed surprising humanity IMO - I think it was Keith Joseph, but open to correction - ages since I read it.)

Yes, Charles, a bit "holier than thou" this going to work when you could be watching a nice bullfight. Double pay for working a public holiday?
Perhaps The Times is a bit like an embassy, considered foreign soil?
Nice work if you can get it - I'd do all my teaching hours on a Sunday to get double pay, but no-one sees the logic of that but me. : )

Posted by: dot king | 12 May 2008 16:34:33

PETER KINGSLEY: Maybe we're not talking about the same place but never mind -it's just to re-adjust memories - I remember "La Source" in the Boul Mich quite differently and this was in 1951 - it was the VERY first "help-yourself" restaurant in the Boulevard. It has now inevitably been replaced by a "Quick" whose back door gives on to the rue Champoillon where the cinemas are and one of them already was!

Posted by: Ros | 12 May 2008 16:36:32

"the nation that already enjoys more vacation days than any other"

As a matter of fact, France has less "jours fériés" than Austria, or Italy... see
http://www.touteleurope.fr/fr/actions/social/emploi-protection-sociale/presentation/comparatif-le-temps-de-travail-dans-l-ue.html

And annual working time of Germany is smaller than France's... http://ftp.iza.org/dp3402.pdf

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=1073,46587259&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&p_product_code=KS-QA-08-004
(Table 8. Average actual hours worked per week in all jobs by country and sex, %)

The survey you mention takes into account only "online people" who have answered the survey on expedia.com, which is for people who have time and money to travel...

"35 heures" are only for large corporations, and parts of the public sector... Today is a working day for my (small) company here in Paris (we chose today for giving our 7 hours to the elderly)...

"Lazy France" is a nice cliché (almost a « marronnier » on this blog),
but it is actually not true...

[Thanks Frederic. There are lots of statistics to draw on. I didn't say that France had more jours fériés than other countries, just more days off per year. This has been lately increased by RTT, as reported by the French media when the Harris survey came out last month. Checking on the methodology of the Harris survey, it seems to be a legit online sampling, not a simple response from readers. The back-up poll in Europe was a full-scale traditional exercise. A subject can be a maronnier (old chestnut) and still be true. Do you know of any other country that does ponts like France ?... CB]

Posted by: Frederic Garzon | 12 May 2008 16:39:21

PS to my last post, perhaps "blaming the victim" was the subtitle to the book I mention and the title "the cycle of deprivation".

Posted by: dot king | 12 May 2008 16:47:41

"The SNCF railways solved this by adding two minutes 40 seconds to its staff's working day."

At last, somebody noticed. Alas, he is a British journalist. If there were any indignant headlines in the French media at the time this despicable trick was allowed to pass, I missed them.

In English, I think this is called adding insult to injury.

As for a French translation, is one allowed to publish the words "foutage de gueule" on a Times blog?

Posted by: Robert Marchenoir | 12 May 2008 16:52:46

At my French family get-together in the sunny 9-3 yesterday there was much excitement about the proposal from Brussels to make May 9th a Europe-wide public holiday to mark the founding of the EU. There was also some worry that it could replace and not be added on to the May 8th holiday.
There was also some regret that there are now no more official days off for the rest of the month, just when we were getting used to topping up the tan before the real big summer holidays in July or August.
Jogging alongside the Seine this lunchtime I noticed that many people were dressed for work. It seems that Whit Monday has not yet been reinstated as a day off for everybody.

Posted by: john o'doe | 12 May 2008 16:58:44

Cher M. Bremner : let me offer (after a longish interval) another Bengali perspective from Delhi on the globe's oldest rivalry.

Your posts are generally so perceptive and elegantly written. However, the old Anglo-Saxon bug surfaces occasionally and you cannot resist a little bit of French-bashing. When you harrumph that "French workers need to produce more per hour to have any hope of competing because, what with holidays and the 35-hour working week, the country labours much less than any other", you really miss the basic issue. May I draw your attention to a scintillating piece by Paul Krugman in your rival journal, the New York Times, in 2005 ? Krugman says basically that it is a matter of social choice - the French have collectively chosen to work less, so that they can have more "family-time" and other socially meaningful activities. I leave you to go through Krugman's article in its entirety. However, there is an indication that you do have a basic idea of what all this is about. After all, you pose the question : "Who would want to live like the British?".

[Thanks, Jay. And you're absolutely right. My point was that France lives better over all by giving a priority to leisure and family time. But it comes at the cost of less output. I don't think it's French-bashing to make that point. I remember Krugman's article, but it's a standard argument, shared by everyone who knows the country. And yes this is an old chestnut of a subject, but it's been a very quiet few days here -- thanks to that great quality of life. CB]

I look forward to your future writings.

Posted by: Jay Bhattacharjee | 12 May 2008 17:02:35

"As for strike [...] their working hours [the teachers'] have been the same for 60 years, and they haven't had a real raise for 20." (Pats)

The same? Meaning: not many?

When Ségolène Royal, the socialist candidate for the presidency, suggested that teachers do a 35 hour week as long as they agreed to do them on the school premises, there were howls of outrage from the unions.

Right now, a large portion of the working hours the teachers say they put up are done at home, preparing class and correcting pupils' papers. With nobody to check, obviously.

Maybe the looong hours French teachers say they clock up are not so many after all.

It is funny you fail to make the connection between the low pay you complain about (an opinion about which I would mostly agree), and this privilege ferociously defended by teachers unions.

You cannot have it both ways.

If one understands your sentence correctly, you are also saying that a strike is a legitimate way to take a few days off because of an alleged taxing work schedule.

Were does that come from? Not from the law. Not from the constitution. And certainly not from common decency or morality. Which French teachers claim to instill into children's minds when they blather about "citizenship".

Posted by: Robert Marchenoir | 12 May 2008 17:14:30

In the Herault, Butchers, Bakers, Banks and Barbers (and, for all I know, Brothels) were all closed on Monday, if there was a Saturday market day. In another Comment I mentioned restos open all night in France if near a hospital, PTT, Gendarmerie, railway station, all-night markets like Les Halles (Au Pied de Cochon) or newspaper office, for the toilers of the night. Hence my disapproval of the raised eyebrows at Mr. Bremner going to work on a public holiday, and reminds me of a Liverpudlian reporter telephoning a vicar for a comment about the coal mine closing, the vicar saying, pompously: "You should not be working on the Sabbath, the Lord's day."
"Why you pretentious little man of God," the reporter said. "No doubt you will be reading your morning paper tomorrow, and having bread for breakfast, shovelling coal on your fire and eating fish on a Friday. You can do this because there are men who work on Sundays, and all night, and at weekends, so that you can sit with your feet up on Sunday evening in your cosy little cocoon while weary men sweat with aching muscles just to keep a parasite like you happy."
Many years later, in Fleet Street the same man, now a crime reporter who lived on pub snacks and fried food, was diagnosed by his doctor as having a rare disease not seen much in England. It was called scurvy.

Posted by: peter kinsley www.peterkinsley.com | 12 May 2008 17:27:57

Those were great days, Ros, the rue de la Huchette and Le Vieux Colombier where I drank with (I hope I am not annoying anyone!) Claude Luter in the rue, and Sydney Bechet ("Les Oignons") in the V-C.
and I once heard J-P Sartre harangue Simone de Bouvoir (on terrace of cafe Napoleon) for signing the paper confirming to the Nazis she had not a drop of Jewish blood in her veins, so that she could continue teaching. He said by signing she had collaborated, and she was furious.

Posted by: peter kinsley www.peterkinsley.com | 12 May 2008 17:43:20

Charles should have someone look into this because I'd really like a definitive answer, all the statistics seem to contradict each other. On "La Matinale" on Canal + this morning, Leon Mercadet told us that:

La France bosse fort:
"Contrairement à ce que pourraient laisser croire certaines déclarations fracassantes de campagne, les français travaillent plus que la moyenne de l'Europe à 27. Avec 38h par semaine, ils effectuent une heure de plus que les anglais et 2h30 de plus que les allemands."

It turns out that the Dutch have the least working hours, followed by other Nordic countries (all rich countries), and that the poorer Eastern and Southern European countries work the most. The French work pretty hard, in fact, and more than the British (??!!). I'm counting on your national pride to challenge this statement.

What I do know is that I've worked on deals with Dutch counterparts where everyone left the office at 5 PM sharp, leaving a closing in the loop...French in fact work pretty late hours and can get annoyed at that sort of laxism. Of course, when working with US counterparts in May or in August, they have the same problem with the French....

[No other country in Europe, or the world, has a 35-hour legal working week like France. That's the basis for the comparison. I'm not criticising it. It allows people to do other things and creates a happier existence for many. The French work hard during working hours. No-one contests that. In the business world, executives work longer hours, like those elsewhere. CB]

Posted by: qwerty | 12 May 2008 17:51:46

"Do you know of any other country that does ponts like France?" Yes, Mr. Bremner - the 'puente' was an established and beloved tradition in Spain, and I believe it still is. In Colombia, they had another approach when I lived there about 12 to 14 years ago; religious holidays were moved to the nearest Monday, giving no extra days off but at least ensuring a 3-day weekend.

[Colombia is far from the only country to celebrate public holidays on the nearest Monday. Britain and the United States have been doing that for ages. The disadvantage with the French and other system is that no-one gets a holiday when they fall on a Sunday. I know Spain and Latin America have their puentes, but my impression is that France does it in a big way. See the video coming up on next post (midnight Paris time) with comedian Anne Roumanoff joking about unions finding it hard to find a day to strike in May because of all the days off. CB ]

Posted by: Ian H. Young | 12 May 2008 18:03:19

Ros

"maybe, but I don't think it would have been a real catastophe if he'd have stayed at home - we could have waited until tomorrow to read our Posts!"

No we can't wait Ros!

WE NEED OUR POSTS AND WE NEED THEM NOW!

Posted by: rocket | 12 May 2008 20:45:35

Jay Bhattacharjee

"the French have collectively chosen to work less, so that they can have more "family-time" and other socially meaningful activities."

Then let them stop complaining about the cost of life and lack of money.

Economics 101

Posted by: rocket | 12 May 2008 20:53:37

Robert, you put words into my mouth, comparing a strike to a holiday, but I won't answer and leave you to your teacher bashing.

Posted by: Pats | 12 May 2008 22:27:49

Une journee de greve, ce n'est pas une journee de vacances, camarade !

Posted by: Marguerite. | 12 May 2008 22:45:07

"France has more days off per year than other countries." (CB)

"the French have collectively chosen to work less, so that they can have more "family-time" and other socially meaningful activities." (Jay)

My theory is that the French have more holidays because they NEED more holidays. In North America we manage to mix a little of everything into each day. People work from nine to five, kids go to school from nine to 3:30 or 4:00. Supper is at six o'clock, which goves people time to do things in the evening.

In Canada, in winter half the adult population (possibly slightly exaggerated) can be found in the curling rink after supper, and half the kids at the skating rink. The swimming pools are open, extra-curricular activities are going on at the school -- band practise, basketball practise, play practise, and so on.

In summer the parks are full of people playing baseball after supper, or throwing frisbees, or people are working in their gardens, or taking swimming lessons, or whatever.

In France it's "boulo, metro, dodo".
Kids go to school from 8 a.m. to 4:30 or 5:00, adults work from eight to six, they don't eat supper till 8 p.m., and after that there isn't time for anything but going to bed, and they're too exhausted to do anything anyway. So they NEED holidays because they would never have fun otherwise.

It seems to me in France it either all work, or all play, whereas we "anglo saxons" mix in a little of everything each day, so we don't need holidays so much in order to relax and enjoy ourselves.

Does anybody agree with this?

Posted by: Maggie | 12 May 2008 23:20:37

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=85QWOA0MYJQ

Posted by: dada | 12 May 2008 23:31:26

Azloon -

"does anyone in france know what Pentecost is? what ever happened to laicite"

I know a lawyer in Brooklyn who jokes that she was only hired because she was Catholic and they needed someone to work Friday afternoons and Jewish holidays. (All the Jews - religious or not - had to be home by sundown.)

My Muslim SGT and I once figured that if we embraced all three Abrahamic religions, we'd get a three day weekend every week.

Posted by: Fernandez | 13 May 2008 00:37:23

Maggie -

"adults work from eight to six..."

That would mean a 50 hour work week!

What happened to the 35?

Posted by: Fernandez | 13 May 2008 01:09:56

Yes Maggie I agree with you - particularly with regard to the amount of time children spend at school.Why is it ok for adults to have a 35 hour week and yet young children are expected to start school at 8 o clock in the morning finish 8 or 9 hours later and then do homework on top?

Posted by: isobel | 13 May 2008 05:25:58

Fernandez,

Forgot to mention that they have two hours off for lunch, both at school and at work. And I think with the 35-hour work week, a lot of people get off early Friday afternoon.

But I think it makes more sense to start at nine, especially in the winter, than to have a two-hour lunch.

Posted by: Maggie | 13 May 2008 06:40:15

[My Muslim SGT and I once figured that if we embraced all three Abrahamic religions, we'd get a three day weekend every week.] Mary F.

throw japan in there and work would be voluntary. :)

Posted by: azloon | 13 May 2008 06:55:53

le pont is alive and well here in the Antipodes. The first Tuesday in November is Melbourne Cup Day, and a public holiday in this city. Monday is usually taken as a day off. Any year Australia Day (January 26) falls on a Tuesday or Thursday makes a long weekend, the same goes for Anzac Day, 25th April. Christmas Day on a Tuesday adds a long weekend before or if it occurs on a Wednesday, a long weekend after Boxing Day. As for scrounging in the bin for food, USA allegedly has the least holidays and has the highest poverty rates in the OECD. Beggars are common on Australian city streets now and we Australians allegedly work longer hours than the lot of you-42 hrs pw.

Posted by: kevin brewer | 13 May 2008 07:00:12

Maggie, the idea of having dinner at 6 PM makes me want to throw up (I believe that in Holland and in some parts of the US they even eat at 5...). What's specific about the French eating ritual is that they think a meal is a "moment of sharing" (food, thoughts, pleasure), discussion with the kids, etc. It's not every member of the family doing his own thing after grabbing a sandwich on the corner of the kitchen table.

And vacations are a moment of discovering other places and ways of living besides your own neighbourhood. They are an opening of the mind, a dépaysement.

Posted by: qwerty | 13 May 2008 07:28:52

"What's specific about the French eating ritual is that they think a meal is a "moment of sharing" (food, thoughts, pleasure), discussion with the kids, etc. It's not every member of the family doing his own thing after grabbing a sandwich on the corner of the kitchen table." (Qwerty)

The kids going out to the skating rink after supper doesn't mean that supper consists of "grabbing a sandwich on the corner of the kitchen table". Families eat a proper, healthy meal together, talk together about what happened at school etc, and then there's still time to go out for an hour or two in the evening.

Skating rinks are full of families -- the parents are needed to tie up all those skates, because don't forget, in Canada kids learn to skate almost as soon as they know how to walk. You have 3 and 4-year-olds at the skating rink after supper too, not just teenagers. This is a healthy way to spend time.

When my husband worked in Estonia (another northern country), I noticed this too. In the evening the swimming pool was open and you saw families with young children there.

Do the French really have "dinner" in the evening? I thought the whole point of them having two hours off at noon was to allow them to have a proper meal then, and then a lighter meal in the evening.

Maybe the idea of eating at 6 PM makes you want to throw up, but there are a lot of advantages to it. The French have such a rigid schedule that they really don't have time to enjoy themselves much during the week. That's why I said they NEED holidays more than we do.

"And vacations are a moment of discovering other places and ways of living besides your own neighbourhood." (Qwerty)

Yes, but not everybody, even in France, can afford those vacations. Doing things in your own neighbourhood is not such a bad thing. And don't forget, in North America, certainly in Canada, we don't have hundreds of other cities a short distance away, and trains running every few minutes all day long. Distances are greater and communities are more isolated. In summer lots of people just go to the lake. (And that doesn't mean they're deprived -- try it.)

Nowadays lots of people even think Christmas is a good time to fly halfway around the world. Not everybody can afford this, and is it good for the environment? What's wrong with simple pleasures, and participating in the life of your community?

I personally found it extremely difficult to adapt to the French way of dividing up their time, with the stressful rigid week, alternating with the many holidays. It's always all work and no play, or all play and no work. It really is totally different from our way.

Posted by: Maggie | 13 May 2008 09:33:11

Yes, Peter Kingsley "those were great days' & you bring back the same happy memories as I have. After 27 years of living in Provence I'm back in the Latin Quarter, very gradually most of the shops & cafés have changed, the PUF has recently disappeared too!
"Do you know of any other country that does ponts like France ?... CB] - yes, just take Eurostar between Christmas and New Year and you'll have a whole week of "ponts" but am not sure how it's done, partly because of Boxing Day as an extra?

Posted by: Ros | 13 May 2008 09:43:05

On school times: where I work the first lesson in the morning is at 8.25, there is a break 10.15-10.30, then lunch is 12.20-13.45, a break in the afternoon 15.35-15.50 and school is out at 16.45.
So lunch isn't 2 hours, but 1h25m, and that is to get all the classes, in rotation, through the refectory.
Many pupils living in the country come into school by bus, and many of them have to be at the pick-up point before 7am and then are dropped off there again in the evening, well after 6pm.
That is a very long day, to which homework and hunger are additional.
Those lucky enough to have parents who can drop them off and pick them up get a better deal as they can get some of their homework done "en étude" whilst waiting.
The Halte Garderie of schools (and nearly every school has one for the children of working parents) is usually open from 6am and closes at 18.30 or even 19h in the evening.

Teachers who go on concours are usually expected to make up the teaching hours missed in their absence.
The system "mutation" means that teachers can be attributed a post within a very far-reaching area. I have a colleague who drives in from the other side of Toulouse to start at 8.25am, so that means that when I am getting out of bed at 6.45am, he is already on the road and has been awake for ages, and has to do the same journey to get back home.
So please, knock the system all you want, the teachers are very restricted in this seemingly immutable system, physically, geographically, and in terms of organisation and subject-matter.

The 35-hour week. The law concerning this applies only to enterprises having more than a certain number of employees (I think it's 10+).
Try contacting your plumber or electrician, who works alone or with an apprentice, or a gardner for that matter - chances are you will get either un répondeur or a wife, and the entrepreneur will ring you back late in the evening or, between 12 and 14h. My woodman (for eg) never delivers before 18h, but always within 48 hours of an order.
All this doesn't, IMO, add up to "lazy, workshy French".

I have also worked here in a small business; the official hours were 35. In reality things were different. If there was a client in the agency at the time I should lock up and leave, then I didn't, I dealt with the client in the same way I would have at any other time of the day - same thing at lunchtime (12.30 - 14h).
If I was out somewhere, at a house or at a notaire's for example at closing time, then I couldn't just get up and leave, until the work was finished. I have arrived home from a completion at 21h+ more than once from one particular notaire who insisted on "practising" her very poor English, at the cost of a very long day for everyone.
Clients would also sometimes insist on taking me out to dinner for my hard work - now this sounds really lovely of them, and it often was - but what they really want to do is ask lots of complicated questions and thus keep you working until a late as 11pm. (I found a way of knocking this on the head at the risk of being thought lazy and workshy or ungrateful!) Clients also think nothing of telephoning in the evening, at home, and on Sundays.
Without being rude, there is very little you can do about it. It got so bad that I gave my friends a code-ring and wouldn't answer otherwise.
I well remember an American couple spending HOURS at a house and the woman saying to her husband "maybe we should let them know at the hôtel that we won't be in for dinner at 6.30." I said "I think they already know you aren't going to be there, it's 7.15."
"Oh no," she said, and what about you? What time do you finish?" I couldn't resist, I'd really had it by that time, and replied, "Six o'clock." It was another half-hour before we moved.
And all this doesn't count the Sundays and bank holidays which are other people's free time, but added to my work-time - in that job.
The boss also worked hard, but I don't think he worked as hard as I did, because he doesn't speak English (I presume he still doesn't), also because I now realise that a lot of his absences were spent serially philandering, but there's a subject for a different thread one day!

When the 35-hour week became law, there were people whose job it was to check up, and we would get phone calls from whichever government agency was in charge of it. My boss would field the calls, avoid answering, say he was with clients, in a meeting, just leaving, whatever came into his head, but would not answer the questions. I knew perfectly well that the law only applied to larger enterprises and when one day it was I who picked up the phone, I calmly answered their questions and: end of story.
For some reason, he was furious, but then he was always furious for some reason or other, so business as usual . . . : )
The above, of course is my experience, but I know from some of my French friends that it isn't at all unusual in small enterprises to be at the total mercy of the clientèle - and the boss - if you want to keep the job, you do the necessary.
Thank you for your kind attention. : )

Posted by: dot king | 13 May 2008 10:48:29

Maggie I agree that it's "all work and no play or all play and no work" in France, and as a British person it's something I find it strange too. I was having a conversation a few months ago with a French friend who has a good postion in a major french company - all the benfits of 35 hour week, rtt job for life (he's worked in the same company since graduating over 25 years ago) etc. I said I found it strange how obsessed french people were with holidays and he said that going to work in France was not something many people enjoyed doing -very rigid hierarchical system, promotion often not based on merit but on who you know etc etc. He said he'd noticed when visiting other companies abroad, including the UK that the work atmosphere was much more relaxed and friendly.
Do other French people agree that the reason for the French love of long holidays is the unpleasant working environment in France?

Posted by: isobel | 13 May 2008 11:36:05

Well, it wouldn't be fair to France to actually work at writing something original during the month of May in France (please take note Charles) but please allow me to cut and paste something I wrote on the subject 2 years ago on, well, yeah, my blog:

To Holiday or not to Holiday?

Yesterday was Pentacote, minor holiday in the catholic world that was also, until recently, another work holiday in France, a country where work holidays outnumber varieties of cheese.

Until recently, I say, because two years ago, Pentacôte was officially downgraded to a simple workday in France just like any other.

This downgrade was the official government response to intense public outrage two years ago following the brutal heat wave in August 2003 that left 15000 elderly dead from dehydration and other heat-related causes. An outraged French public, upon returning home from their annual month-long August holidays and finding that tante Ghislaine and oncle François were no longer with them except in spirit, demanded explanations from the government. State officials, who had spent the better part of the blistering month on the various beaches of the world themselves, had to come up with some sort of official-sounding measure that would renew frenchpersonnes’ confidence that a) of course the French govt was fully capable of controlling the weather if it had only not been on holiday itself, and b) they (frenchpersonnes) could continue to take the month of August off without having to worry whether grand-mère and grand-père, left behind in the unventilated Paris apartment, were drinking the recommended minimum daily quantity of Evian.


The principal official-sounding measure issued by the perspiring govt was that frenchpersonnes would work on Pentacôte. They would do this in an inspiring show of solidarity, not receiving pay for their workday (which up until then had been a paid holiday) but rather ceding the wealth generated by working on a ‘holiday’ to the govt, who would redistribute it in some way guaranteed to help improve the sort of the elderly.

This did not go down well with the public, who will do many things to help their fellow man, even old ones, but working a whole day without pay is not one of them. So, like many french laws that attempt to change things, respect for this law became ‘tentative’, then ‘optional’. And as of yesterday, ’selective’.

(There is an old joke that the French tell about the Belge or Poles, or Corsicans, or whoever they’re feeling smarter than at any given time, about how the govt of that country decided that the British way of driving, ie, on the left side of the road instead of the right side, wasn’t such a bad thing, and that it would be a good thing to do it in their own country. But officials couldn’t decide on the timing of the change, afraid that people would be perturbed by too abrupt a change in habits.

The compromise that was eventually reached, that was deemed satisfactory to all sides, was that during the first 30 days of the new method, only heavy trucks would drive on the left…

Ha, ha…)

So, on this, the second attempt at a Pentacôte as non-holiday workday, the first results are in:

* School teachers went to work but students were given the day off.
* Parents, who were supposed to go to work, wound up staying home to care for their children.
* Businesses were expected to remain open but truck deliveries were forbidden.
* The wonderful open farmers’ markets everywhere in France were open, but for lack of delivery, the stands were empty.
* Because the markets were bare, the restaurants didn’t bother to open.
* MacDonalds did a thriving business.

Posted by: textibule | 13 May 2008 14:42:42

dot ; interested in your introduction of the working hours at your school , approx 7 hours per day , nice work if you can get it in my opinion
however it doesn't enable me to make a fair comparison , maybe they work more days ?[ when I was at school it was 5 1/2 days per week ]
so how many days per week , also per years please

Posted by: colin grayson | 13 May 2008 14:55:17

ahhhh, it's so nice to see us arguing about which of our respective countries has 'la plus raisonnable système de travail' rather than whose wartime atrocities were the most heinous and barbaric.

for a wonderfully humous account of the reaction of one Brit to the french workplace, see "My Year in Merde,' a memoir of this guys' attempt to set up a chain of tea houses in Paris.

My son worked for media relations company in Paris run by an american (who had lived in Paris for 25 years) but was essentially a french company, with exclusively french employees.

It was after this experience that he, rather plaintively, asked me if I minded if he never worked in a conventional occupation ever again (he was treated rather shabbily, particularly by french clients of the firm). he is now a free-lance writer and director in the u.s.

Incidentally, my son didn't think 'My year in Merde' was as hilarious as i did. so perhaps i was laughing at the stereotype and not at actual working conditions. or he was having a 'bad hair day.'

Posted by: azloon | 13 May 2008 15:26:59

Textibule

Very funny account of the May holiday chaos in france. You can't invent this stuff !!

one a somewhat different subject but not unrelated to france's particular brand of absurdity (we all have our own):

re France's obsession with obscure laws and tradition:

my son was working as a bicycle tour guide in Burgundy one summer and staying in the servant quarters of an old chateau (i suppose there aren't any news ones). the maintenace guy there one day was replacing apparently perfectly satisfactory panes of glass in the building. my son asked him what he was doing, and he replied, "Oh, the law says we have to do this every one hundred years." as i said, you can't invent this stuff.

Posted by: azloon | 13 May 2008 15:54:01

colin grayson:

I was making a point of the length of the day for the pupils more than for the teachers.
The school does a 4.5 day week, no school Saturdays, or Wednesday afternoons.
I believe the number of teaching hours per pupil and working presence of teachers are laid down at government level, but I don't know more than that, I do know the organisation of it varies from Académie to Académie.
I intended no criticism of tecahers nor their *apparently* short working hours, indeed I'm the one who gets off lightly as my work doesn't involve me in any conseils de classe or parents' evenings. Nor do I have any marking or examining load.


Posted by: dot king | 13 May 2008 17:13:51

As some commentators have pointed out, France has an average working time that is far higher than many other european contries. CB, you say that the fact of working less has a cost. Actually, according to the study cited by Léon Mercadet, statistics say the opposite, and quite surprisingly contradict the basic belief "more work-more output": the countries that are economically and socially the most performant in Europe are those where the weekly average time of work is the lowest (first of them Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Germany). The higher the weekly average time of work gets, the lower is the country's economic performance.

Posted by: Christine | 13 May 2008 18:19:05

"re France's obsession with obscure laws and tradition:"

That's called history, Azloon. WE who stayed here in Europe, we did not forget our roots, our history and our traditions, obscure and stupid and ridicule as they may look to your young eyes :)

Posted by: V | 13 May 2008 19:51:42

"re France's obsession with obscure laws and tradition:"

That's called history, Azloon. WE who stayed here in Europe, we did not forget our roots, our history and our traditions, obscure and stupid and ridicule as they may look to your young eyes :)

Posted by: V | 13 May 2008 19:52:06

Christine,

You say : "The higher the weekly average time of work gets, the lower is the country's economic performance".

May be, may be. We live in a crazy world! However, one should also look at the unemployment rate. Another related parameter one should not neglect too is the number of assisted persons who would be able to work, but who don't, since they manage to live on subsidies and a little bit "travail au noir" if not drug smuggling in a few extreme cases.

To finance these numerous persons (clients of various political parties and organizations), average persons "stupid enough" to work have to work harder during longer hours ... The whole system may possibly have an influence on "the country's economic performance" :))

May be that the Northern governments and citizens are less tolerant (or "stupid") in these matters as we are.

I remember distinctly a TV reporting on a British shop center may be three years ago. A Turkish worker (he could have been Welsh, Scot or Cockney as well) arrived at the center and said that he had lost his job. He had a meeting with a clerk, who explained him what he could expect in terms of unemployment subsidies. One and a half hour later, he accepted a new job ... I can't remember the details, but the new job was probably not a sinecure.

Posted by: Daniel Strohl | 13 May 2008 22:49:28

[That's called history, Azloon. WE who stayed here in Europe, we did not forget our roots, our history and our traditions, obscure and stupid and ridicule as they may look to your young eyes :)] Vee

ah, mon bon ami, i see you have such a high opinion of your riposte that you sent it twice.

would you please tell me more about the history behind this french law requiring the replacement of chateau window glass every one hundred years? what earthly reason could there be?

France has had more Republiques than it has had glass replacements.

p.s. i have never associated 'staying' somewhere as any sort of great virtue. it's basically another way of saying 'doing nothing.' but if you're happy, i'm happy.

:)

Posted by: azloon | 14 May 2008 04:15:40

Azloon,

"would you please tell me more about the history behind this french law requiring the replacement of chateau window"

Most probably, there is no such French law - may be the maintenance guy did make some fun out of a young "Amerlo":))

Posted by: Daniel Strohl | 14 May 2008 08:31:56

Daniel Strohl,
As a matter of fact, the rate of social expenditures in Germany, Sweden or Denmark are not lower than in France. In other words, the rate of people living from state subsidies is roughly the same (and even higher if you take the expenditure rate per capita) as in France.
You are right of course, there are always many parameters to consider, but the relation between welfare and low working time the statistics point out is really strikening, and it does not seem to be related in any way to the rate of state subsidies.
Statistics are avalaible here
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=1073,46587259&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&p_product_code=KS-SF-08-046
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=1073,46587259&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&p_product_code=KS-NK-05-020

Posted by: Christine | 14 May 2008 09:54:17

Pats, you wrote:

"Robert, you put words into my mouth, comparing a strike to a holiday, but I won't answer and leave you to your teacher bashing."

By taking care to answer me but limiting yourself to this, you are not trying very hard to disprove the reputation French teachers have for laziness.

You teachers feel free to hector the whole nation with politically slanted rants, year after year. You think it perfectly legitimate to go on strike, prevent children from being taught and make a misery out of parents' lives, just because you oppose the government.

And whenever one citizen dares to argue against this, you whine about "teacher-bashing"? As if teachers were some sort of priests, the criticism of whom would be blasphemy?

Give me a break. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

And if you think you are paid too little, why not direct your anger at your unions, instead of at the government?

It's the unions who have insisted for decades on increasing the number of teachers, at the same time the number of pupils was falling. While doing this, they neglected to fight on salaries. When was the last strike where teachers' wages were a major point?

No, all we hear is: we don't want reforms, and we want more staff.

The explanation is obvious: the more civil servant there are, the more powerful the unions get. They have more teachers to put into the street whenever they feel like staging a demonstration (which is quite often).

They have more teachers they can use as permanent staffers for free, thanks to that marvellous French institution which is called "détachement": instead of being paid by the citizens for teaching their children, they are paid to "work" full time for the politicized unions, sabotaging the efforts of democratically-elected governments.

Teachers' unions do not care more for teachers than they care about children, the citizens or the country. All they do is try to expand their own power, and make sure their own militants get cozy jobs.

Posted by: Robert Marchenoir | 14 May 2008 11:23:45

"WE who stayed here in Europe, we did not forget our roots, our history and our traditions"
(Valentin to Azloon)

Just a minute, isn't this the person who makes such a great mystery of who he is and where he comes from? Who carelessly swapped one nationality for another?

Those Europeans who set out for the Americas took their culture (history and traditions) with them, which is why today's USA is as it is. It has surely evolved from the sum total of all of its immigrant populations.

Posted by: dot king | 14 May 2008 11:59:37

"Do other French people agree that the reason for the French love of long holidays is the unpleasant working environment in France?"(Isobel)

Although English, I have worked for French companies in France for the last 16 years, so feel half qualified to offer a view.

Most French people I know (both employés and cadres) are prepared to put up with almost zero job satisfaction (which barely registers on their radar as a job choice factor) in exchange for good benefits (job security, holidays, RTT, comité d'entreprise, etc etc). All of which is protected by the sacrosanct principle of the "droit acquis". This means basically that once a benefit has been given it can never be taken back.

Almost the last thing anyone wants to do is change companies. So many benefits are tied into the length of time you have stayed with the same company (ancienneté). In the event of redundancy those employees with less than two years service get nothing. It is well known that even in the largest private sector businesses, salaries are notably lower than market average but people are happy to accept this in exchange for a job for life and ever increasing benefits...

This is an attitude I remember far less from the UK where people would be happy to change jobs at the drop of a hat for a better salary and more satisfying job.

It is this attitude (coté employé) as much as the difficulty of firing someone (coté employeur) that makes the French labour market so static.

Posted by: Richard | 14 May 2008 13:16:35

TEXTIBULE:
In French "pentacôte" (sic) is spelt Pentecôte, and in English, Pentecost.

you can save that up for your blog, next year : )

Posted by: dot king | 14 May 2008 16:03:19

Robert,

"Teachers' unions do not care more for teachers than they care about children, the citizens or the country. All they do is try to expand their own power, and make sure their own militants get cozy jobs".

This is probably the reason why only a small percentage of teachers are in the unions - 20% said a teacher/ blogger recently; unfortunately, I am not able to remember his name.

Posted by: Daniel Strohl | 14 May 2008 17:45:01

Daniel: even 20% of unionized teachers would be a lot, relative to the French average (around 8% if I remember correctly).

How much respect do you get if so few of the people you pretend to represent actually care to support you?

Posted by: Robert Marchenoir | 14 May 2008 18:48:15

Robert,

Most of them - at least the most conspicuous and the most plaintively vociferous in the media - do not deserve any respect and do apparently not get it from their non unionized colleagues.

But nevertheless, they have a big "pouvoir de nuisance". Let us hope that at least this government will not back down in front of them, unlike its various predecessors from the right or from the left.

Posted by: Daniel Strohl | 14 May 2008 21:42:08

Robert,

a small point for you : did you know that teatcher are paid on a basis of 10 months of work per year, divided by 12 in order to be paid every month of the year?

That is linked to history, when entire France had to go back farming in July / August. This was never corrected due to summer hollidays.

So, please, stop complaining about hollidays and don't worry : your taxes do not pay 60 of their days off! They pay it themselves! For the rest, believe me, they work more than many of those working in some private companies i experienced....

And you know what? they are often (not always i confess) more usefull...

Take a "pont", you'll feel better.

Posted by: Dominique | 14 May 2008 22:11:21

A statistical survey shows that 52% of the French sleep very badly on Sunday night because they apprehend going back to work on Monday morning. In fact, their whole Sunday is screwed because of thinking about having to go back to work the next day.

But guess what? the same statistical survey carried out in the US and other countries gives a result of 72% of workers similarly affected.

They're right: going back to work on Monday is like going back to boarding school.

Solution? Be an independent professional, you get to choose your working days/hours and your clients. Weekdays merge with weekends, but then you can take days off in the middle of the week if you want to. Or be an entrepreneur: hard but creative and rewarding; in principle the work is not supposed to feel like work. Or finally, be a writer or an artist: although it stretches you to your emotional and intellectual limits, it's not work, and it's when you want it.

OK, now that I've flexed my writing muscle, must get back to my book.

Posted by: qwerty | 15 May 2008 08:22:26

While building a house in the Herault, I introduced the hard working and efficient French builders (freelances/entrepreneurs) to Monday Club, invented by Irish and Brit. builders in London. It caught on, and now if you hear a man splattered in plaster wearing bedroom slippers (the correct apparel for a plasterer) and hear the words Lundi Cloob, you will not expect him back unti Tueday.
BTW: I would take a builder for lunch in a very posh resto. and they didn't bat an eye. In London we would have been ordered out and told to wear ties etc. Thus the fruits of Revolution.

Posted by: peter kinsley www.peterkinsley.com | 15 May 2008 10:52:56

"Be an independent professional" -- Q

QWERTY --

you're definitely 'on' to something.

i was a 'wage slave' for twenty-years and resented the hell out of it. i was one of those 72% who sensed impending doom late on sundays (tho i slept ok, but now sleep poorly, in retirement -- go figure!).

when i became independent for the last 20 years of my career, i was emancipated, joyous and free. i probably worked more (and avoided work less), but i was richly rewarded for that extra work (financially and emotionally).

i have encouraged all my children to be entrepreneurial. all are, either completely or to a considerable extent.

and your point about time off: just knowing i could take off anytime i wanted was liberating. and tho i didn't do this often, because i liked my work, it was somehow comforting.

i usually spent three weeks in europe every spring, courtesy of my company, and another week somewhere relaxing at another time during the year (i worked in commission-only sales so my employer could care less what i did as long as i produced).

i ended my career working three and half days a week with a hired assistant filling in for me for the one and a half i wasn't there. it was sort of the 'cherry on the sundae' for a job well-pursued and which ran itself after many years of building it.

the french don't know what they're missing.

of course, we never got an extra week off for rioting in the streets. Bummer. :)

Posted by: azloon | 15 May 2008 14:24:13

Qwerty, Azloon

I love your posts. You are both right.

"the french don't know what they're missing" (Azloon).

Some of them know - but it took me up to twelve years prior to my retirement to get it ... It was not always easy, but it was very rewarding. I slept very well (if not always enough) at that time and I continue to sleep very well, but longer :))

PS : Qwerty, si je ne suis pas indiscret, vous préparez un livre?

Posted by: Daniel Strohl | 15 May 2008 17:10:04

"the french don't know what they're missing". Azloon

The costs and charges involved in creating your own business are so high here, and to these must be added all the taxes and social security contributions etc, that unless you're comfortably off to begin with, for the sake of your family and/or whatever else, it looks too risky to take the chance.
Whatever advantages they say you can have if you launch yourself, don't stand up to close examination. It gets people out of the loop and out of the statistics that look bad for the gov't.

Take one small example (as i understand it): a person who works part-time says to themself that they could run a small business in the other time. From their part-time salary are taken social security/health/retirement/unemployment contributions, and these will have to be paid again for the small business - it's a different "caisse" so they think it's normal. Plus the "taxes professionnelles" and other fixed amounts and insurance policies etc. So any nett salary earned in the part-time job would mostly be eaten up by paying social charges twice - and this before the business has earned anything.
Unless you have a certain healthy fall-back capital or are young enough to fall over and spring back up again - the exercise just ain't worth doing for most people.
It's the French system that discourages enterprise.
Do you realise that to work in a bookshop, they expect you to have a special qualification "brevet de libraire"?
We've been here before methinks. It's not the French who are unenterprising, they are (outside of les bobos de Paris) right now, hanging on for life to their homes, their jobs, etc, in a negative system that has fiery hoops to jump through at every stage.

Posted by: dot king | 15 May 2008 17:25:03

Dominique:

"Did you know that teatcher are paid on a basis of 10 months of work per year, divided by 12 in order to be paid every month of the year?"

Yes. I did. Strangely enough, I had to research it. You wouldn't know it if you only listened to the media. The same media that gives so much exposure to the unions' claims.

That just proves my point. If the teachers' unions were doing their job, everybody would have been deaf by now, listening to such a thing.

At the end of the day, however, this is just a rethorical trick. The unions were too silly and too self-centered to use it in their propaganda; it might have helped them to get raises for their members.

But it's just that, anyway: propaganda. Who cares about the obscure formula used by French bureaucrats to compute their salary?

What counts is how much you actually get. Per month. Or per year.

I'm sure that when teachers, or their unions, quote their -- supposedly meager -- salary, they use the actual amount they receive every month, and not the purely theoretical, higher figure they would have received, had they been paid ten times a year.

Unless they are terminally stupid.

Posted by: Robert Marchenoir | 15 May 2008 21:53:53

qwerty,

Why does a 6PM meal make you want to throw up?? Don't you think it is possible to have a full sit down meal at 6pm???

Posted by: Rose | 15 May 2008 23:15:58

Dot,

"It's the French system that discourages enterprise."

Exactly - it is complicated and expensive. You have described it very well, Dot. The French system has been designed by civil servants for civil servants and not for (small or medium sized) entrepreneurs.

Enarques are high level civil servants - and when they move out of the state system to get into private industry, i.e when they "pantouflent" in bobo parlance, they keep most of the time the intellectual arrogance they have been fed with at their various Grandes Ecoles + ENA.

This means that details are often not important for them and should therefore be cleared by low level rank and file.

Examples of "details" : wiring and wiring software compatibility in big civil aircrafts; "juicy" ("juteux" - I am not sure of the translation) credit markets in the USA and elsewhere which should pay handsomely without problems etc. And when something goes wrong, their caste will back them up most of the time. If faults have been made, these are due to uncompetent staff, who are usually fired if not prosecuted in some special cases ...

Of course, I exaggerate a little bit. There are very competent and courageous énarques too ... Sarkozy is not énarque - this is almost équivalent to "une tare originelle" :))

Posted by: Daniel Strohl | 15 May 2008 23:21:51

"The SNCF railways solved this by adding two minutes 40 seconds to its staff's working day."

So what ? Le résultat est le même il me semble : à la fin de l'année ils ont donné une journée de salaire comme tout le monde non ? Je ne vois pas où est le problème. On devrait tous faire exactement la même chose, comme ça le problème du lundi de pentecôte serait réglé.

Quant aux ponts, effectivement il n'y en a pas aux States parce que les jours fériés tombent toujours un vendredi ou un lundi et si par un malheureux hasard le 4 juillet ou le 11 novembre tombent un samedi ou un dimanche, ils ne travaillent pas le vendredi ou le lundi. C'est commode quand même !

En France, quand le 1er et le 8 mai sont tombés un dimanche, je n'ai entendu personne demander à récupérer les lundis suivants ! Mais ça bien sur, personne n'en parle, on préfère penser que les Français ont trop de jours fériés, c'est plus facile.

Ici, Thanksgiving tombe toujours un jeudi, eh bien croyez-le ou non, les écoles publiques (et la plupart des commerces) sont fermés le lendemain. Est-ce qu'on peut appeler cela faire le pont ou non ?

Posted by: Sandrine | 16 May 2008 03:29:51

Rose:
Certainly not. In normal circumstances, I'm too busy around that time. Besides I don't get hungry before at least seven. And where's the festivity in eating at six?

(The thought of starting to prepare dinner at five....)

Posted by: qwerty | 16 May 2008 07:15:26

rose, Qwerty, come on girls, what's this preoccupation with routine and food and mealtimes? Qwerty shame on you, I thought you were "free" : )

Sandrine, je suis d'accord avec tout ce que vous dites - cette année le 1er mai était aussi le Jour de l'Ascension, nous n'avons eu qu'une seule journée fériée, et je n'ai entendu aucune plainte à ce sujet.
Le système que vous décrivez pour le USA opère assez répanduement également au Royaume Uni.
Les Français n'ont pas de "Boxing Day", ni de Vendredi Sainte comme jours fériés; Pâques, c'est le dimanche/lundi et c'est tout.

Posted by: dot king | 16 May 2008 12:17:13

Sandrine,

We are glad to have you back on the blog. You are our (French) Voice of America :))

Posted by: Daniel Strohl | 16 May 2008 13:37:35

""The SNCF railways solved this by adding two minutes 40 seconds to its staff's working day."

"So what ? Le résultat est le même il me semble : à la fin de l'année ils ont donné une journée de salaire comme tout le monde non ? Je ne vois pas où est le problème. On devrait tous faire exactement la même chose, comme ça le problème du lundi de pentecôte serait réglé."

(Sandrine)

I cannot believe it. I think you must be an underground agent of big business, with a mission to ridicule socialism through your blog comments.

Have you ever worked in an actual business or organisation? When is the last time you saw people toiling with a supervisor behind their back, stopwatch in hand, telling employees: "No, no, fourty seconds to go, keep working, your workday is not finished yet"?

Not since half a century, at least. Especially not in a public organisation such as SNCF, where attitudes towards schedules are notoriously relaxed.

It is obvious for everyone that this 2 minutes and 40 seconds farce has not changed a thing to the real work schedule of SNCF employees.

This is a slap in the face of the millions of Frenchmen whose work is really counted in hours and days, not in this Mickey Mouse fashion.

I'm being dead serious now: if I were you and working for the state as you do, I would stop nagging my fellow citizens the way you and your colleagues keep doing. Contrary to what you seem to think, it might be fun, but it is not very smart.

There is a very simple reason to it. The current situation cannot go on for ever. The debt is unsustainable. When the tide will reverse (and it's a question of when, not if), you civil servants will be in a very bad position if you insist in keeping this arrogant attitude until everything comes crumbling down.

You are a numerous lot, but you are still a minority in the country. If, some day, the state becomes bankrupt, and Mr. Dupont has to queue up for hours outside his bank in the hope of retrieving a few dozen euros because accounts have been frozen, as has happened very recently in the United Kingdom, don't think for a minute that the general populace will keep their present benevolent attitude towards civil servants.

At that time, it will have become clear to all that the latter's selfishness was a major factor for the country's misery.

Things might get ugly then.

Posted by: Robert Marchenoir | 16 May 2008 15:49:50

what have banks and subprimes got to do with the SNCF working 2m40s extra per day?
sorry robert marchénoir, i think you might have lost quite a few of us there, your comment comes across as almost leftwing
"come the revolution" . . . etc

Posted by: dot king | 16 May 2008 17:25:00

Je réitère ce que j'ai dit plus haut. So what ? L'essentiel est qu'à la fin de l'année ils ont donné une journée de leur salaire non ??? Non? Le but n'était-il pas de récolter des SOUS pour les maisons de retraite ? Donc, quelque soit la manière dont on donne cette journée, je ne vois pas en quoi c'est offensant pour le reste des travailleurs.

Cela étant, monsieur je-suis-plus malin-que-le-reste-de-la-Terre, savez-vous que dans les administrations, on pointe ? Vous savez ce que c'est une fichue pointeuse ? Donc, si on vous dit de travailler 2 min 34 secondes de plus chaque jour, il y a un moyen très simple de s'assurer que c'est bien fait.

Si dans le privé les patrons n'ont pas assez confiance en leurs employés (qui ne pointent pas of course) pour faire ces 2 minutes de plus par jour, qu'ils les obligent donc à venir travailler un jour férié si ça les enchante. (Il me semblait pourtant que dans votre monde "enchanté", c'était chacun qui décidait librement ce qu'il souhaitait faire et non le maudit gouvernement !)

Par contre, il me semble que la soi-disant solidarité nationale n'est pas si nationale que ça n'est- ce pas ? Tout le monde n'est pas obligé de la donner cette journée de travail à ce qu'il parait ? Alors quid des autres ? Ils ne deviennent pas vieux eux aussi ? Ils n'ont pas de personnes âgées dans leurs relations ?

Quant à vos menaces à deux balles sur les fonctionnaires, les socialistes, vous pouvez vous les garder (faudrait voir à se calmer deux secondes là). Je ne comprends même pas pourquoi vous vous en prenez à moi sur ces sujets.

Posted by: Sandrine | 17 May 2008 15:58:28

Daniel,

I keep on reading this blog because I still like it, but I don't find all the subjects very interesting (no offense Charles), so I wait until I find one that I like.

Euh, juste entre nous, "V" c'est Valentin ?

Dot King,

"Sandrine, je suis d'accord avec tout ce que vous dites - cette année le 1er mai était aussi le Jour de l'Ascension, nous n'avons eu qu'une seule journée fériée, et je n'ai entendu aucune plainte à ce sujet."

Exactly my point. Mais quand on écoute certains Français maintenant (ceux qui sont à la droite-droite de Sarko), il y a beaucoup beaucoup trop de jours fériés en France, on devrait tous les supprimer sauf le 14 juillet (et encore !). Non mais qu'est-ce qu'on peut entendre comme bêtises !! ;o)

Posted by: Sandrine | 17 May 2008 16:07:08

Sandrine,

V = Valentin

Posted by: Daniel Strohl | 17 May 2008 18:45:07

"V = Valentin"
Oh? En jus'how can you be so sure! Btw last friday I decided to work 2 minutes more and so left work at 18:32. But - strange enough - no one else seemed to notice the effort, despite the progress I made on my project. Hmmm...
:)

Posted by: V | 18 May 2008 04:16:37

Merci Daniel.

"But - strange enough - no one else seemed to notice the effort, despite the progress I made on my project. Hmmm..."

Attaboy !! But don't worry, Robert with his "super" powers, he knows everything, so I'm pretty sure he's aware of what you've done for your country. He must be so proud of you !! sigh...

Posted by: Sandrine | 18 May 2008 13:38:33

Sandrine: vous avez la langue bien pendue, mais vous avez un peu trop tendance à prendre vos concitoyens pour des cons. Or il se trouve que votre patron, ce sont vos concitoyens. Un patron n'aime pas beaucoup qu'on le prenne pour un con. Au-delà d'un certain point, il ne discute plus. Il vire.

Posted by: Robert Marchenoir | 20 May 2008 12:28:15

"Sandrine: vous avez la langue bien pendue"

I'll take that as a compliment, venant de vous !

"Au-delà d'un certain point, il ne discute plus. Il vire."

Damn !! And I'm sure that if you could, you'd fire me in a heartbeat. Thank God you're not really MY boss !

Posted by: Sandrine | 20 May 2008 17:45:13

"Thank God you're not really MY boss !"

Not him, but Monsieur Sarkozy (que Dieu le garde! :P ) is, and we do hope he'll do the spring cleanup in all those dirty lockers of the French administration.
40 hours for you - AND NO TAX EXEMPTION ! :)

Posted by: V | 23 May 2008 01:30:30

"AND NO TAX EXEMPTION !"

Since when being a civil servant allows me to benefit from tax exemption ? If I don't pay the "impôt sur le revenue", maybe it's because my salary is not THAT high at all (je suis au bas de l'échelle) and because I raise my daughter ALONE. You would have my salary and you would raise your child alone, you'd benefit from that too ! Don't you think ???

Rien à voir avec le fait d'être fonctionnaire ! C'est débile de penser ça ! Et je paye la taxe d'habitation et la redevance télé comme tout le monde. Soit 400 euros tout compris (mon appart est en banlieue). Donc je ne vois pas de quelle exemption tu parles. Encore un mythe sur la Fonction publique ?

"and we do hope he'll do the spring cleanup in all those dirty lockers"

Keep praying buddy. De mon côté, j'attends toujours l'augmentation de salaire promise à tous les fonctionnaires en échange du non-remplacement d'un départ en retraite sur deux. J'ai -finalement- arrêté de croire au Père noël, pas toi ? ;o)

Posted by: Sandrine | 26 May 2008 22:47:30

Oh come on Sandrine, if you were to work 40 hours, your 5 hours would probably be payed as overtime, no matter how profoundly unjust you would be with regards to our dear President.

I also think that those who don't believe in Santa, should be left out of the gift distributing. Lists should be made by the people in charge of each team and department, so that our Country's resources not be scattered and wasted on the ungrateful! :o)

Posted by: V | 27 May 2008 09:17:10

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Charles Bremner


  • Charles Bremner

    Charles Bremner is Paris Correspondent for The Times and has previously reported from New York and Brussels.

    Send Charles an Email

    Follow Charles on Facebook

RSS Feeds

  • Click for RSS 2.0 feed

three random posts